Understand what the experimental tool does not establish and find related public resources.
KPG supports exploration of pronunciation representations. It is not a complete reviewed dictionary, a speaker recording, or a full description of every aspect of spoken Kifuliiru.
A practical reading hint and an ordinary written form have different purposes. Retain the original spelling when using a generated hint. Read notation and IPA before treating a display difference as a correction to a dictionary entry.
No. The project identifies some mappings as candidates for review and leaves prosody unimplemented pending native examples. A result should keep that experimental status when shared.
The public phonetics reference provides a fuller language explanation, while the evidence guide explains how to ask a precise question.
The checked project includes review interfaces, but persistent review history and related features remain future work. Keep a separate record of important evidence and explanations rather than assuming an interface interaction establishes a published linguistic decision.
This collection does not advertise a deployment address that has not been verified. It explains the experimental resource from its project source and the related public language references. Use the Lab’s public information for wider project context, and rely on an actual published tool link when one is provided.
Include the input, intended meaning, output, disputed point, and relevant recording or speaker explanation. Distinguish an unavailable screen from a disputed linguistic result. The former is an access or behavior question; the latter needs evidence about the language.
For practical listening, use portal audio guidance or Kifuliiru FM. For reviewed contribution preparation, use Tabula.
